Driving on any roads and legal registration would be made all the easier with a process of continuous improvement.
Most businesses that operate in small niche markets, value their customers and hold them in high esteem, welcoming their feedback so that they can continuously improve their product and hopefully hold on to them as repeat customers or that they will generate further word of mouth business.
Given the issues that have been encountered with 2700 and the minimal (minor jig changes) cost of the changes that could be initiated to make future cars compliant, not just in our jurisdiction, (which seems one of the more stringent, along with Switzerland) but globally, why would you not do this.
These issues, remedial actions and general quality control have been brought to the attention of the management, with no response at any level.
Would I recommend someone to buy an AC from the present management, most certainly not. It seems that they operate on the (military) principle of like it or lump it.
Moral of this story - if you are considering buying a recent AC, go for a proven design such as the CRS, SB or MKIV, at least they seem to be built by people that have a conscience and are more concerned with the quality of the product delivered, rather than minor improvements to the driving experience, which most owners would carry out themselves, should they wish
