Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AC Ventura

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13
76
Hobo, thanks for your reply which I found interesting. I am under no illusion regarding the car that I hope will materialise from my work. I have for years read the problems of the Mk IV FE conversions and not come across one happy owner. But not everybody wants a crazy, overpowered, ultimately uncontrollable car. However, there are many happy owners of the big block cars, although they are US based and mostly of course replicas. The secret of car modification is to be able to develop it yourself and be capable of doing that. Professional shops dont have the time to get it right or come up with new ideas. They are always under pressure timewise so can’t sit still and think about how best to solve the problem. I have my own engineering facility and have built several cars. My aim is a outrageous road car for fun only. However I am going to unusual lengths to ensure its serviceable. For example the gearbox and clutch will be removable without needing to move the engine.  The Cobra isn’t a very practical car for all weathers here in the UK, so it’s always going to be a special occassion car.
 I agonised about the 347 and 331 and I know they can offer enough power and would have been a vastly easier prospect. In the end my mind was made up, when I realised that the car has already the 427 chassis, the 427 body and the 427 suspension, so I wanted to experience the full fat experience before they stop selling petrol.
 By the way, the Mk IV is perfectly balanced with the all iron 302, so if your getting a Windsor stroker, I’d keep it iron block with aluminium everything else...or it might be very tail happy.
 Incidentally, I read and my engine builder advised that the 0.64 5th is not the best choice on the TKO 600 in Cobra, despite the power delivery. The drop is too much, always in and out of 4/5. Most owners regret and want the progressive 0.82. I’m running a 3.54, but might need 3.31.
 I’m wondering with over 500 hp what exhaust pipe diameter you have after the primaries and whether it the cockpit is cooler or hotter with the underfloor exhaust? Suppose you can’t tell, if you just changed the rad and I’d also be interested to know of the dimensions of that if it works well.
 

77
I'm trying to use an external fork for actuation. I have to remake the bulkhead anyhow. I'm also think of installing the earlier 'A' struts from under the dash hoop, to the chassis rails. My clutch is a Mcleod 12" Super street pro.

78
This is the best quality I can upload

79
It’s the 0.5” shorter Quick Time RM 6057 and the TKO is a matching short input shaft. I have a steel flywheel and McLeod 12” clutch.  I’d be iterested to know what clutch actuation parts you used.

80
The TKO 600 5 speed

81
The all alloy 427 FE

82
Just another day in the engine shed, preparing for instalation of an all aluminium, Ford 427 FE (big block) side oiler, plus TKO 600 into my ‘93 Mk IV. The project is fraught with technical feasibility issues. Most importantly,  the engine position will be key to minimising the compromises. It will be bad enough doing this once, so it better be right, At the very least, the grp footwells, the engine mounts and some chassis crossmembers need cutting out and replacing, so this kind of caper is not for everyone. All things being equal, I guess it depends on your life agenda: Keep it original at all costs, or experience, maybe improve on the legend?. Either way, it’s worth mentioning that all this can be reverse engineered back, just as easily as it’s been modified.
To be as sure as one can be, regarding feasibility choices, I have meticulously measured the engine and trans in meticulous detail. I’m aware people have done the 427 conversion, but not as far as I am aware with an all aluminium motor and the 5 speed TKO. This incidentally can be had with a extra high 5th for economical motorway cruising. However, I rejected that option in favour of progressive gearing. This is not exactly an economy drive after all.
 Anyhow, I’ve converted the data into a scale CAD drawing, showing how the the car should look with the engine installed. To get it where it needs to be and the vital propshaft angles correct, means positioning the entire 5 foot long drivetrain within 4-5mm. You can see it’s all very tight.....but it might just work. Incidentally the huge 7 litre FE weighs just 20 lbs more than the current cast iron 302. Shelby never had this available, nor ceramic header coatings and that’s the attraction....

83
Very nice, maybe a little lower would be prefect. I think the Trigos very similar to the Hawk/Autokraft originals and right now, the only option. You will see my car uses 65 profile tyres (Avon 225/65/15) in the front and with no rubbing, although this depends on offset. Plus you get more front ground clearance. These are the same diameter as the 275/55/15 rears.
 How do you find the mirrors? I tried  every round unit under the sun, but found the original units the only ones that work in every situation, including when opening the doors with sidescreens fitted.

84
General Discussion / Re: loading images
« on: January 10, 2018, 19:04:05 »
Fantastic. Well done the admin team !!!

85
General Discussion / Re: loading images
« on: January 10, 2018, 19:02:40 »
I don't mean to be annoying, this is what I've been working on today and I just want to see it works

86
General Discussion / Re: New Forum
« on: January 10, 2018, 18:59:11 »
Excellent news abut this. Thanks so much

87
General Discussion / Re: New Forum
« on: December 26, 2017, 19:21:31 »
Fantastic news about the ease of adding photos. Thank you !

88
General Forum / AC Owners club Badge
« on: November 27, 2017, 21:51:54 »
We can no longer easily post photos

89
ACOC News and Events / NEC stand.
« on: November 13, 2017, 22:13:16 »
I couldn’t make the show this year, but nothing wrong with that stand. Nice work guys.

90
ACOC News and Events / NEC stand.
« on: November 12, 2017, 21:28:09 »
quote:
Originally posted by AE512
   
sexist and exploitative?
   

   
    Fair observation Glenn, especially in today’s, take no prisoners, climate. I agree it is sexist, as one of the definitions of that is female stereotyping. Hoewever, exploitative? That would infer that these young women had some advantage taken of them, because of a situation they found themselves in. In my view, I think it highly unlikely that any of them would not be fully aware that they the purpose of their employment at the show,  would be to wear figure hugging outfits for the purpose of attracting a predominately male audience to visit the stand occupied by, or be made aware of Lancaster Insurance.
    Really if female models continue to willingly agree to appear like this, is to fair to blame the poor old bloke who instinctively casts an eye their direction? Is it not him that is being exploited by the far from unintentional exposure here?
    I do agree however that the concept of draping attractive girls over cars is outdated and a bit naff, although I realise that this pic was simply a bit of provocative fun.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 13